Wednesday, August 24, 2011

U.S. to Slash Marcellus Shale Gas Estimate 80%

Bloomberg


"The U.S. will slash its estimate of undiscovered Marcellus Shale natural gas by as much as 80 percent after a updated assessment by government geologists.

The formation, which stretches from New York to Tennessee, contains about 84 trillion cubic feet of gas, the U.S. Geological Survey said today in its first update in nine years. That supersedes an Energy Department projection of 410 trillion cubic feet, said Philip Budzik, an operations research analyst with the Energy Information Administration. Link

“We consider the USGS to be the experts in this matter,” Budzik said in an interview. “They’re geologists, we’re not. We’re going to be taking this number and using it in our model.”

The revised estimates, posted on the agency’s website, are likely to spur a debate over industry projections of the potential value of shale gas." More>>>>



Fracking might have caused Colorado/New Mexico Area Quakes

http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/ksfr/news.newsmain?action=article&ARTICLE_ID=1843949


Listen at KSFR

"SANTA FE, Aug. 23 -- Following a succession of earthquakes near New Mexico's northern border, geology professor Rick Astor of New Mexico Tech says one possibility for the "swarm" of quakes in that area is the prevalance of energy drilling there.

He says faults inside the earth have stress and often can slip. "Earthquakes could be induced if the fault's frictional properties are altered by the injection of (fracking) fluids."'

Monday, August 15, 2011

60 Minutes: "A look at the world's new corporate tax havens"

60 Minutes
August 14, 2011

"(CBS News)

Our government is in knots over ways to lower the federal budget deficit. Well, what if we told you we found a pot of money - over $60 billion a year - that could be used to help out?

That bundle is tax money not coming in to the IRS from American corporations. One major way they avoid paying the tax man is by parking their profits overseas. They'll tell you they're forced to do that because the corporate 35 percent tax rate is high in relation to other countries, and indeed it seems the tax code actually encourages companies to move businesses out of the country.

Tax havens: Do companies pay their fair share?
"60 Minutes" correspondent Lesley Stahl talks tax havens and the new ways American companies are stashing their profits abroad.

Companies searching out tax havens is nothing new. In the 80s and 90s, there was an exodus to Bermuda and the Cayman Islands, where there are no taxes at all.

When President Obama threatened to clamp down on tax dodging, many companies decided to leave the Caribbean, but as we first told you in March, instead of coming back home, they went to safer havens like Switzerland.

Several of these companies came to a small, quaint medieval town in Switzerland called Zug.

Hans Marti, who heads Zug's economic development office, showed off the nearby snow-covered mountains. But Zug's main selling point isn't a view of the Alps: he told Lesley Stahl the taxes are somewhere between 15 and 16 percent.

"And in the United States it's 35 percent," Stahl pointed out.

"I know. It's half price," Marti said.

Marti told Stahl that Zug most probably has the lowest tax rates in Switzerland.

"So you're kind of a tax haven within a tax haven?" she remarked.

"Maybe, yes," he acknowledged.

The population of the town of Zug is 26,000; the number of companies in the area is 30,000 and growing at an average rate of 800 a year. But many are no more than mailboxes.

Texas Democratic Congressman Lloyd Doggett questions whether the recent moves of several companies are legit. "A good example is one of my Texas companies that's been in the news lately, Transocean," Rep. Doggett told Stahl.

Transocean owned the drilling rig involved in the giant BP oil spill. They moved to Zug two years ago.

Extra: Benefits of bringing back cash
Extra: How to shift profits

"I'm not sure they even moved that much. They have about 1,300 employees still in the Houston area. They have 12 or 13 in Switzerland," Doggett told Stahl.

"And yet they claim that they're headquartered over there," Stahl remarked.

"They claim they're Swiss. And they claim they're Swiss for tax purposes. And by doing that, by renouncing their American citizenship, they've saved about $2 billion in taxes," Doggett explained.

Stahl and "60 Minutes" decided to visit their operations in Zug.

A woman at the door told Stahl, "At the moment my boss is not here."

She said her boss wasn't there and we should call someone halfway around the world, in Houston.

"But this is the headquarters," Stahl remarked.

"I know," the woman said.

When asked if the CEO was there or is normally at the Zug office, the woman said "No."'

Produced by Shachar Bar-On


Link>>>>

Thursday, August 11, 2011

Gas Fracking Poses Serious Environmental Risks, U.S. Panel Finds

Bloomberg


"Natural-gas companies risk causing serious environmental damage from hydraulic fracturing unless they commit to the best engineering practices, a task force named by Energy Secretary Steven Chu concluded.

Regulations to protect public health will work best when drillers embrace techniques that avoid “undesirable consequences,” according to a draft report today by a subcommittee of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board. The increased use of fracturing, or fracking, which forces water and chemicals into rock, raises the potential for a “serious problem,” the panel found.

The report offered recommendations for companies involved in fracking, such as Chesapeake Energy Inc. and Southwestern Energy Co. (SWN), to follow, and guidelines for state regulators that oversee drilling.

“While many states and several federal agencies regulate aspects of these operations, the efficacy of the regulations is far from clear,” according to the report. “Effective action requires both strong regulation and a shale-gas industry in which all participating companies are committed to continuous improvement.”

The Environmental Working Group in Washington, which advocates for clean air and water, questioned the findings of a panel it said was dominated by the gas industry. The Independent Petroleum Association of America in Washington, which represents oil and gas companies, said the report marks “a useful starting point,” for discussions." More>>>>Link



Tuesday, August 9, 2011

New Mexico Oil and Gas Association proposes rule for disclosing makeup of fracking fluids

SUSAN MONTOYA BRYAN Associated Press

"ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — Looking to avoid the criticism that has dogged energy producers in other states, a New Mexico industry group introduced a proposal Monday that would require drilling companies to be more transparent when it comes to using hydraulic fracturing fluids to extract oil and gas." More>>>>

Saturday, August 6, 2011

EPA takes hard line on PNM power plant pollution

(2011-08-05)
(KSFR) -
"In a victory for environmentalists, the EPA is going to require that PNM reduce nitrogen oxide emissions at its four-corners generating station by 80 percent. The company and the state had both recommended a 20 percent reduction.

The EPA is giving PNM two additional years to meet the requirement at its 40-year-old, coal-fired San Juan power plant. It must complete the work in five years instead of the three-year period that had been discussed.

PNM says the EPA plan will cost upwards of $750 million while the company's alternative would have cost about 10 percent of that amount. PNM says customers may well have to shoulder the costs.

PNM says it plans to appeal the decision."

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Board eyes greenhouse-gas rules

Environmentalists decry decision to reopen hearings

Jeri Clausing | The Associated Press

"ALBUQUERQUE — A state board appointed by Gov. Susana Martinez agreed Monday to consider repealing greenhouse-gas regulations opposed by her administration, utilities and oil and gas companies.

The Environmental Improvement Board scheduled a series of public hearings beginning Nov. 8 on the rules, which were put in place under former Gov. Bill Richardson.

Martinez calls the carbon controlling rules a "cap and tax" and included them on a list of Richardson-era environmental regulations that she has targeted as hampering business growth in the state.

Public Service Company of New Mexico and others had gone to court seeking to overturn the rules. The state Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court agreed recently to let the parties take the issue back to regulators for consideration.

The decision to reopen hearings on the matter raised the ire of environmentalists, who have accused Martinez's administration of secretly colluding with polluters by holding meetings with the plaintiffs in the lawsuit in an effort to move the case out of the courts and back under the administration's control. " More>>>>

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Enviros win voice in carbon battle

Court: Groups can intervene in feud over emissions rules repeal

Susana Montoya Bryan | The Associated Press
Posted: Wednesday, July 27, 2011

"The New Mexico Supreme Court on Wednesday cleared the way for environmental groups to intervene in an ongoing legal battle over whether the state should regulate greenhouse-gas emissions.

Attorneys for the groups said the justices' unanimous decision will ensure that proponents of the regulations will have a seat at the table if courts have to determine the fate of the state's carbon emissions policies. " More>>>>

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Showdown in Tierra Amarilla

Land Grant Committee (interim) meeting tomorrow regarding the Tierra Amarilla Land Grant mineral rights issue:

Details from the Rio Grande Sun:

"The state legislature’s interim Land Grant Committee scheduled a meeting beginning at 10 a.m. July 28 at the Abiquiú Community Center. The meeting aims to address various land grant issues, focusing on the Tierra Amarilla Land Grant mineral rights issue at 1:45 p.m. Wells, the president of the Board, is scheduled to testify."

The rest of the story:

"Oil company's quiet deal with Land Grant sparks anger, internal mistrust"

By Andrew Kasper
SUN Staff Writer
Published:
Thursday, July 21, 2011 10:08 AM MDT
"After news of a questionable buyout and controversial plans to drill for oil on the Tierra Amarilla Land Grant became public, oil man Jack Steinhauser stepped into the lion’s den.

He visited Tierra Amarilla July 13 and stood before a group of agitated and confused Land Grant heirs and attempted to explain his plans to drill on land that belonged to their ancestors, while also trying to clarify how a $233,000 payment that was intended for the entire Land Grant ended up in the hands of just three Board members — without the rest of the members’ knowledge.

The payment was in exchange for a 2008 legal promise, or waiver, by the Land Grant that none of the members would pursue a future claim to the oil Steinhauser and his company, Wind River Energy, are poised to extract from 93,000 acres in northern Rio Arriba County and southern Colorado." More>>>>

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Governor considers replacement of state's top water official

Staci Matlock | The New Mexican

"The governor's staff is once again looking for candidates for the state's top water job.

Current State Engineer John D'Antonio, confirmed under former Gov. Bill Richardson, is welcome to reapply for the job, said Scott Darnell, a spokesman for Gov. Susana Martinez.

"No decision has been made to replace Mr. D'Antonio, but the Governor wants to ensure that a wide range of options are considered before selecting a permanent State Engineer," Darnell said via email."...

..."Hernandez said he was told he was part of a search committee. "They called us individually and asked us to submit names by today (Monday)," Hernandez said. "I was the first one called, so I assumed I would head the committee."

Darnell, however, said no formal search committee has been formed. "We are asking for input from people throughout the state who are familiar with the critical water issues facing New Mexico ... ," Darnell said. "Unlike the transition, this is not a formal search committee; rather, it is an effort to cast a wide net and be inclusive in seeking a full range of options regarding the State Engineer's Office. We have reached out to a number of individuals and groups seeking their input, ranging from farmers, business people, and even the New Mexico Environmental Law Center."

Douglas Meiklejohn, executive director of the New Mexico Environmental Law Center, confirmed the organization was asked to submit names for state engineer. "We respectfully declined to be involved in that process," he said, also declining to comment on why.

Meiklejohn also declined to comment on whether or not he thought D'Antonio should be replaced. " More>>>>

Environment Department official resigns after bureau move

Staci Matlock | The New Mexican

"A top official with the state Environment Department resigned Tuesday morning, a day after the bureau overseeing Los Alamos National Laboratory's compliance with hazardous-waste regulations was moved from his division.

It was one more shake-up in a department that's seen more than a few in the last six months."...

..."The decision to move the bureau was made by Environment Department Secretary F. David Martin and Deputy Secretary Raj Solomon. They did not respond to questions regarding Davis' departure.

People familiar with the situation, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of repercussions, said the decision to yank the bureau from Davis' division was the final straw in a string of disagreements he had with the new administration. They believe the change was prompted by a recent notice of violation that Davis' division was pursuing against LANL for failing to meet some terms of the consent decree. A LANL spokesman confirmed there was a notice of violation, with fines proposed, but the spokesman referred questions to the Environment Department.

Gov. Susana Martinez made it clear in the first week of her administration that she intended to do away with any policies she deemed unfriendly to business. The Environment Department rapidly became a focus of her attention. The administration set out to undo or overturn new rules and regulations, from green-building codes to greenhouse-gas emissions, which officials said were detrimental to industry." More>>>>

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

MOODY'S PLACES RATINGS OF FIVE OF 15 Aaa STATES ON REVIEW FOR POSSIBLE DOWNGRADE DUE TO U.S. SOVEREIGN RISK VULNERABILITY

Deregulation of the financial industry set the table for the financial crisis. As deregulation continues to be proffered for budget woes, such as for oil and gas drilling, the following Moody's warning is something to keep an eye on and to keep in mind as part of the many unfolding consequences of financial deregulation.

"APPROXIMATELY $24 BILLION OF RATED DEBT AFFECTED; HIGH FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT AND MEDICAID EXPOSURE CITED

New York, July 19, 2011 -- Moody's Investors Service has placed on review for possible downgrade the Aaa ratings of the states of Maryland, New Mexico, South Carolina, Tennessee, and the Commonwealth of Virginia. In connection with Moody's July 13 action placing the Aaa government bond rating of the United States on review for downgrade, Moody's announced that it would assess the ratings of Aaa-rated states to gauge their sensitivity to sovereign risk. The review actions affect a combined $24 billion of general obligations and related debt.

Should the U.S. government's rating be downgraded to Aa1 or lower, these five states' ratings would likely be downgraded as well. Moody's will review the ratings of the five states on a case-by-case basis and announce any rating actions within seven to ten days following a sovereign action."...


..."NEW MEXICO

• Sensitivity to national economic trends compared to other Aaa-rated states based on Moody's Economy.com measure of employment volatility due to U.S. fluctuations: Below average

• Federal employees as a percentage of the state's total employment: Above average

• Capital markets risk: Relatively high due to above average amount of puttable variable rate debt outstanding

• Federal procurement contracts as a percentage of state gross domestic product: Above average

• Medicaid as a percentage of total expenditures: Above average

• Available fund balance as a percentage of operating revenue: Above average" More>>>>

Related article:

Big US Banks Ate Everyone's Lunch: Strategist

Monday, July 18, 2011

BP slips up again

MarketWatch Blogs

"In a fresh challenge for BP PLC’s BP effort to clean up its act, up to 4,200 gallons of oil-containing fluids leaked from a BP pipeline during a pressure test at its Lisburne oil field in Alaska’s Prudhoe Bay, according to reports over the weekend. The Anchorage Daily reported that local officials said the ground shook from the force of the line break. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. estimated the spill size at 2,100 to 4,200 gallons of methanol and other fluids, including crude oil." More>>>>

Friday, July 15, 2011

The World Factbook: Natural gas - proved reserves

Central Intelligence Agency

An excerpt from The World Factbook:

"This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions." Link >>>>

Top ten:

"1 Russia 47,570,000,000,000

2 Iran 29,610,000,000,000

3 Qatar 25,470,000,000,000

4 Turkmenistan 7,504,000,000,000

5 Saudi Arabia 7,461,000,000,000

6 United States 6,928,000,000,000

7 United Arab Emirates 6,071,000,000,000

8 Nigeria 5,246,000,000,000

9 Venezuela 4,983,000,000,000

10 Algeria 4,502,000,000,000"

Thursday, July 14, 2011

Exxon exec says doesn’t know Montana spill’s cause

By Molly Born

"WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — An Exxon Mobil executive on Friday told a House committee that the firm had met all regulatory standards even as the company takes full responsibility for an oil spill that dumped an estimated 42,000 gallons of crude into Montana’s Yellowstone River this month."...

..."Tester, a Democrat, appeared before the House pipelines subcommittee to make a statement at the beginning of the hearing and said Exxon needs greater regulation. In this case, Exxon was tasked with regulating itself and now “we’re paying a price for it,” he said.

“Does that sound familiar?” Tester said. “Wall Street had no regulators either and it lead to the collapse of our nation’s economy.”...More>>>>


"Battle for Brooklyn"

“BATTLE FOR BROOKYLN,
THE STORY OF ONE NEIGHBORHOOD’S FIGHT AGAINST THE CONTROVERSIAL ATLANTIC YARDS PROJECT at The SCREEN

August 25th directors in attendance

Santa Fe:

For showtime:

The Screen

Movie website


Monday, June 27, 2011

Report: Natural Gas Insiders Question Feasibility, Profitability of Industry

DemocracyNow!

"Newly disclosed figures and internal documents are raising fresh doubts about natural gas drilling in the United States. According to the New York Times, well-placed financial analysts and experts have circulated warnings about the feasibility and profitability of drilling in shale gas wells across the nation. An August 2009 memo from the firm IHS Drilling Data says, “The word in the world of independents is that the shale plays are just giant Ponzi schemes and the economics just do not work.” Earlier this year, an analyst at PNC Wealth Management compared natural gas projects to the dot-com boom, saying, “money is pouring in” even though drilling is “inherently unprofitable.” In another memo, a retired geologist for a major oil giant writes, “These corporate giants are having an Enron moment… They want to bend light to hide the truth.” A review of more than 9,000 wells shows many wells are failing to meet industry projections, with just 10 percent recouping their estimated costs after seven years. Just 20 percent of wells in three highly regarded shale formations in Texas, Louisiana and Arkansas are believed to actually be profitable. The previously undisclosed data could raise questions about whether companies are illegally inflating claims about the size and productivity of their wells. A former Enron executive who went on to work for an energy company compared the behavior of shale gas firms to his former employer, writing, “I wonder when they will start telling people these wells are just not what they thought they were going to be?”' Link>>>>

The New York Times
By Link
Published: June 26, 2011

..."In scores of internal e-mails and documents, officials within the Energy Information Administration, or E.I.A., voice skepticism about the shale gas industry.

One official says the shale industry may be “ set up for failure.” “It is quite likely that many of these companies will go bankrupt,” a senior adviser to the Energy Information Administration administrator predicts. Several officials echo concerns raised during previous bubbles, in housing and in technology stocks, for example, that ended in a bust."... More>>>>



Monday, June 13, 2011

Firm says deal with land grant opens area to drilling

Tom Sharpe | The New Mexican
Posted: Sunday, June 12, 2011


"A Canadian firm says it has a deal with a land-grant association that could open up parts of Rio Arriba County to petroleum drilling that previously were restricted by questionable land titles.

Wind River Energy Corp. says it has agreements with the board of trustees of the Tierra Amarilla Land Grant that could mean billions of barrels of oil, mostly from shale deposits that require "fracking."

"Wind River believes that the waiver will resolve a 150-year-old historical title cloud that has constrained oil and gas development on the Tierra Amarilla Land Grant," a recent news release says.

The Vancouver, British Columbia-based company has issued three news releases since late last year, announcing it has acquired from a Texas firm a waiver and an indemnification agreement with the Tierra Amarilla Lane Grant board, which was paid $233,979.

Wind River's Denver-based president and chief executive officer, Jack Steinhauser, said the news releases are public disclosures required by the regulations of the Toronto Venture Exchange, where Wind River's stock is traded." More
Link

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

"Gasland" Screening in Santa Fe


"On Tuesday, June 21st at 7:00 p.m...." "...a screening of Gasland at the Center for Contemporary Arts in Santa Fe with the event's cosponsors: Conservation Voters New Mexico, Drilling Mora County and representatives from several organizations who are opposing fracking in New Mexico. And after the event, we will have a panel discussion that will feature representatives from these organizations and our Executive Director, Wenonah Hauter who will discuss our national efforts to ban fracking. Come early to chat with us and learn what you can do to make a difference.

RSVP and spread the word today!
https://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/1185/p/salsa/event/common/public/?event_KEY=69644

Hope to see you there

Sam Schabacker
Senior Organizer

Food & Water Watch

sam(at)fwwatch(dot)org"


Tuesday, 6/21, 7-9 pm

Center for Contemporary Arts
Moving Image Lab
1050 Old Pecos Trail, Santa Fe, 87505
Google map


Food & Water Watch is a nonprofit consumer organization that works to ensure clean water and safe food. We challenge the corporate control and abuse of our food and water resources by empowering people to take action and by transforming the public consciousness about what we eat and drink."

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Posting hiatus continues

The posting hiatus will continue for a while.

Until posting resumes, it is hoped that all is well.

Monday, March 21, 2011

Posting Break

Until about the 1st of May, there will be a break in posting.

See you in the Spring!

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Summary of 2011 NM legislative session

"A summary of developments in the Legislature's 60-day session, which ended Saturday.

Gov. Susana Martinez has until April 8 to sign or veto bills passed during the final stretch of the session.


ENERGY-ENVIRONMENT(equals)

Passed: Governmental task force to investigate natural gas outages; create energy conservation bonds; tax credit for biofuels produced from algae; expand scope of cost cap for utilities in meeting with renewable energy requirements; update abandoned mine reclamation law to remain eligible for federal funding; Renewable Energy Transmission Authority bonding changes.

Failed: Invalidate state regulations on greenhouse gas emissions; allow severance tax fund investments in New Mexico renewable energy projects; tax credit for converting vehicles to run on natural gas; define ownership rights in underground pore space that can be used for storage of carbon dioxide." More>>>>


Friday, March 18, 2011

Biggest radioactive spill in U.S. history was in New Mexico (Listen again)

"Biggest radioactive spill in U.S. history was in New Mexico (Listen again)

(2011-03-18)
(KSFR) -
Follow KSFR News on Twitter and on Facebook.
Subscribe to KSFR News Podcasts.



As concern in the U.S. continues over the nuclear-reactor crisis in Japan, what few remember is that the biggest radioactive spill in U.S. history happened right here in New Mexico.

Listen.

© Copyright 2011, KSFR" Link>>>>

Charting the Human Cost of Different Types of Energy

"Since this time last year, we’ve seen a deadly mine disaster [1], the worst oil spill in U.S. history [2], and now a nuclear crisis in Japan [3]. That got us wondering—how does one compare or quantify the human cost of different sources of energy?

As it turns out, a Swiss research organization, the Paul Sherrer Institute, has been doing just that. Using data from the institute, we pulled together a few visualizations." More>>>>